... | ... | @@ -116,11 +116,11 @@ The amount of N retained is calculated assuming an N content of the animal body |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
<span dir="">The amount of N retained in the piglets between birth and weaning (_m_<sub>g, piglet</sub>) is derived from the weight of the conception products, the piglet weight gain between birth and weaning and the mean N content of pigs:</span>
|
|
|
<span dir="">The amount of N retained in the piglets between birth and weaning (\_m\_<sub>g, piglet</sub>) is derived from the weight of the conception products, the piglet weight gain between birth and weaning and the mean N content of pigs:</span>
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
<span dir="">The mass of conception products per piglet is the the overall mass of the conception products (25 kg per sow and litter, see </span>[<span dir="">DLG, 2008b</span>](/9%20Literature#dlg-deutsche-landwirtschaftsgesellschaft-2008b)<span dir="">, pg. 13) divided by the pertinent number of piglets (13 piglets per litter, see </span>[<span dir="">GfE, 2006</span>](/9%20Literature#gfe-gesellschaft-f%C3%BCr-ern%C3%A4hrungsphysiologie-ausschuss-f%C3%BCr-bedarfsnormen-2006)<span dir="">, pg. 74). The resulting mass of conception products per piglet is _a_<sub>cp</sub> = 1.923 kg per piglet.</span>
|
|
|
<span dir="">The mass of conception products per piglet is the the overall mass of the conception products (25 kg per sow and litter, see </span>[<span dir="">DLG, 2008b</span>](/9%20Literature#dlg-deutsche-landwirtschaftsgesellschaft-2008b)<span dir="">, pg. 13) divided by the pertinent number of piglets (13 piglets per litter, see </span>[<span dir="">GfE, 2006</span>](/9%20Literature#gfe-gesellschaft-f%C3%BCr-ern%C3%A4hrungsphysiologie-ausschuss-f%C3%BCr-bedarfsnormen-2006)<span dir="">, pg. 74). The resulting mass of conception products per piglet is \_a\_<sub>cp</sub> = 1.923 kg per piglet.</span>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<span dir="">The TAN content of the N excretions is calculated a</span>s described [above](/4%20Manure%20management/4.1%20Excretions/4.1.2%20N%20and%20TAN-Excretions#tan-excretion).
|
|
|
|
... | ... | @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ The amount of N retained is calculated assuming an N content of the animal body |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
<span dir="">The information on _x_<sub>XP, eggs</sub> provided by the literature varies, e.g. 0.112 kg kg<sup>-1</sup> XP in </span>[<span dir="">GfE (2000</span>](/9%20Literature#gfe-gesellschaft-f%C3%BCr-ern%C3%A4hrungsphysiologie-ausschuss-f%C3%BCr-bedarfsnormen-2000)<span dir="">, pg. 58) and 0.121 kg kg<sup>-1</sup> XP in </span>[<span dir="">Geflügeljahrbuch (2005,</span>](/9%20Literature#gefl%C3%BCgeljahrbuch-2005)<span dir=""> pg. 212). The value used in this inventory (0.119 kg kg<sup>-1</sup> XP) is based on the N content of eggs provided in </span>[<span dir="">LfL (2006a)</span>](/9%20Literature#lfl-bayerische-landesanstalt-f%C3%BCr-landwirtschaft-2006a)<span dir="">, Table 8.</span>
|
|
|
<span dir="">The information on \_x\_<sub>XP, eggs</sub> provided by the literature varies, e.g. 0.112 kg kg<sup>-1</sup> XP in </span>[<span dir="">GfE (2000</span>](/9%20Literature#gfe-gesellschaft-f%C3%BCr-ern%C3%A4hrungsphysiologie-ausschuss-f%C3%BCr-bedarfsnormen-2000)<span dir="">, pg. 58) and 0.121 kg kg<sup>-1</sup> XP in </span>[<span dir="">Geflügeljahrbuch (2005,</span>](/9%20Literature#gefl%C3%BCgeljahrbuch-2005)<span dir=""> pg. 212). The value used in this inventory (0.119 kg kg<sup>-1</sup> XP) is based on the N content of eggs provided in </span>[<span dir="">LfL (2006a)</span>](/9%20Literature#lfl-bayerische-landesanstalt-f%C3%BCr-landwirtschaft-2006a)<span dir="">, Table 8.</span>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<span dir="">The N retention is obtained from the weight gain, the lifespan as laying hen and the mean XP content of the animals:</span>
|
|
|
|
... | ... | @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ The amount of N retained is calculated assuming an N content of the animal body |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
<span dir="">As _X_<sub>DXP</sub> is not available, the digestibility of energy _X_<sub>DE</sub> (see </span>[<span dir="">above</span>](/4%20Manure%20management/4.1%20Excretions/4.1.2%20N%20and%20TAN-Excretions#tan-excretion)<span dir="">) is used instead.</span>
|
|
|
<span dir="">As \_X\_<sub>DXP</sub> is not available, the digestibility of energy \_X\_<sub>DE</sub> (see </span>[<span dir="">above</span>](/4%20Manure%20management/4.1%20Excretions/4.1.2%20N%20and%20TAN-Excretions#tan-excretion)<span dir="">) is used instead.</span>
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Broilers
|
|
|
|
... | ... | @@ -202,21 +202,21 @@ The amount of N retained is calculated assuming an N content of the animal body |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
<span dir="">As _X_<sub>DXP</sub> is not available, the digestibility of energy _X_<sub>DE</sub> (see </span>[<span dir="">above</span>](/4%20Manure%20management/4.1%20Excretions/4.1.2%20N%20and%20TAN-Excretions#tan-excretion)<span dir="">) is used instead.</span>
|
|
|
<span dir="">As \_X\_<sub>DXP</sub> is not available, the digestibility of energy \_X\_<sub>DE</sub> (see </span>[<span dir="">above</span>](/4%20Manure%20management/4.1%20Excretions/4.1.2%20N%20and%20TAN-Excretions#tan-excretion)<span dir="">) is used instead.</span>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<span dir="">The annual amount of N taken in with feed can be calculated from the amount of feed and the crude protein (XP) content of the feed:</span>
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
<span dir="">The N retention per animal place and year (_m_<sub>g</sub>) is calculated as follows:</span>
|
|
|
<span dir="">The N retention per animal place and year (\_m\_<sub>g</sub>) is calculated as follows:</span>
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
[<span dir="">LfL (2006a)</span>](/9%20Literature#lfl-bayerische-landesanstalt-f%C3%BCr-landwirtschaft-2006a)<span dir="">, Table 8, quantify the specific N retention with _x_<sub>N, ret</sub> = 0.035 kg kg<sup>-1</sup>. The description of broilers by </span>[<span dir="">GfE (2000</span>](/9%20Literature#gfe-gesellschaft-f%C3%BCr-ern%C3%A4hrungsphysiologie-ausschuss-f%C3%BCr-bedarfsnormen-2000)<span dir="">, Table 2.3.1) suggests a smaller specific N retention, depending on animal age and, to some extent, on its gender. If the dependency on gender is neglected, the mean specific N retention of broilers can well be approximated by a function of the fattening duration </span>[<span dir="">(Haenel and Dämmgen, 2009a)</span>](/9%20Literature#haenel-h-d-d%C3%A4mmgen-u-2009a)<span dir="">. This function is valid for fattening durations between 21 und 56 days:</span>
|
|
|
[<span dir="">LfL (2006a)</span>](/9%20Literature#lfl-bayerische-landesanstalt-f%C3%BCr-landwirtschaft-2006a)<span dir="">, Table 8, quantify the specific N retention with \_x\_<sub>N, ret</sub> = 0.035 kg kg<sup>-1</sup>. The description of broilers by </span>[<span dir="">GfE (2000</span>](/9%20Literature#gfe-gesellschaft-f%C3%BCr-ern%C3%A4hrungsphysiologie-ausschuss-f%C3%BCr-bedarfsnormen-2000)<span dir="">, Table 2.3.1) suggests a smaller specific N retention, depending on animal age and, to some extent, on its gender. If the dependency on gender is neglected, the mean specific N retention of broilers can well be approximated by a function of the fattening duration </span>[<span dir="">(Haenel and Dämmgen, 2009a)</span>](/9%20Literature#haenel-h-d-d%C3%A4mmgen-u-2009a)<span dir="">. This function is valid for fattening durations between 21 und 56 days:</span>
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
<span dir="">Based on a mean fattening duration of 40 days in 1990 (see Chapter </span>[<span dir="">2.4.1</span>](/2-Input-data/2.4-Animal-activity-and-performance-data/2.4.1-weights-and-weight-gains)<span dir="">), yields a N retention of _x_<sub>N, ret</sub> = 0.0304 kg kg<sup>-1</sup>. For 2010, based on data from </span>[<span dir="">Streiz (2008)</span>](/9%20Literature#streitz-e-2008)<span dir="">, it is assumed that medium-long fattening with a fattening period of approx. 37 days (see </span>[<span dir="">Berk, 2010</span>](/9%20Literature#berk-j-2010)<span dir="">) represents the average fattening period, thus one obtains _x_<sub>N, ret</sub> = 0.0307 kg kg<sup>-1</sup>. In order to avoid underestimation of N excretions (and, as a consequence, N emissions) the inventory calculation used _x_<sub>N, ret</sub> = 0.03 kg kg<sup>-1</sup>.</span>
|
|
|
<span dir="">Based on a mean fattening duration of 40 days in 1990 (see Chapter </span>[<span dir="">2.4.1</span>](/2-Input-data/2.4-Animal-activity-and-performance-data/2.4.1-weights-and-weight-gains)<span dir="">), yields a N retention of \_x\_<sub>N, ret</sub> = 0.0304 kg kg<sup>-1</sup>. For 2010, based on data from </span>[<span dir="">Streiz (2008)</span>](/9%20Literature#streitz-e-2008)<span dir="">, it is assumed that medium-long fattening with a fattening period of approx. 37 days (see </span>[<span dir="">Berk, 2010</span>](/9%20Literature#berk-j-2010)<span dir="">) represents the average fattening period, thus one obtains \_x\_<sub>N, ret</sub> = 0.0307 kg kg<sup>-1</sup>. In order to avoid underestimation of N excretions (and, as a consequence, N emissions) the inventory calculation used \_x\_<sub>N, ret</sub> = 0.03 kg kg<sup>-1</sup>.</span>
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Pullets
|
|
|
|
... | ... | @@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ The amount of N retained is calculated assuming an N content of the animal body |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
<span dir="">According to </span>[<span dir="">LfL (2006a)</span>](/9-Literature#lfl-bayerische-landesanstalt-f%C3%BCr-landwirtschaft-2006a)<span dir="">, Table 8, the specific N retention _x_<sub>N, ret, du</sub> is assumed to be 0.035 kg kg<sup>-1</sup>. Thus, N retained on an average animal place amounts to</span>:
|
|
|
<span dir="">According to </span>[<span dir="">LfL (2006a)</span>](/9-Literature#lfl-bayerische-landesanstalt-f%C3%BCr-landwirtschaft-2006a)<span dir="">, Table 8, the specific N retention \_x\_<sub>N, ret, du</sub> is assumed to be 0.035 kg kg<sup>-1</sup>. Thus, N retained on an average animal place amounts to</span>:
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
... | ... | @@ -282,13 +282,13 @@ As IPCC (2006) does not provide an N excretion value for ostrich, the value from |
|
|
|
|
|
The IPCC default N excretions for rabbit is 8.1 kg pl<sup>-1</sup> a<sup>-1</sup>, see IPCC (2006) 10.59, Table 10.19. This value is unrealistically high as it is in the order of magnitude ot the annual total of life weight gain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This total of weight gain can be calculated as follows (based on data given by LfL Bayern ([LFL Website](http://www.lfl.bayern.de/ilt/tierhaltung/kleintiere/023092/))): duration of fattening period of 87 days, i.e. about four production cycles per year, and final live weigt of 3.0 kg per animal, leading to a total weight gain of 12 kg per place and year. Hence, the N excretions of rabbit have been estimated from the N balance:
|
|
|
This total of weight gain can be calculated as follows (based on data given by LfL Bayern ([LfL website](https://web.archive.org/web/20221005221038/https:/www.lfl.bayern.de/ilt/tierhaltung/kleintiere/023092/))): duration of fattening period of 87 days, i.e. about four production cycles per year, and final live weigt of 3.0 kg per animal, leading to a total weight gain of 12 kg per place and year. Hence, the N excretions of rabbit have been estimated from the N balance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
 In conservative manner, _Δw_<sub>round</sub> was simply set equal to the final live weight (see above). The content of crude protein of the feed, x<sub>XP,feed</sub>, was chosen to be 0.17 kg kg<sup>-1, </sup>cf. [Meissner website](http://www.meissner-widder-kaninchen.de/%20F_WERT_TAB1.html). The amount of feed (fresh matter) needed for animal weight gain is 3.5 kg kg<sup>-1</sup> (LfL Bayern). According to DLG (2005), pg.12, _x_<sub>n,ret</sub> is 0.03 kg kg<sup>-1</sup>. Using this data, the resulting N excretion is 0.8 kg pl<sup>-1</sup> a<sup>-1</sup>. The UAN content of the N excretions is assumed to be 60 %.
|
|
|
 In conservative manner, \_Δw\_<sub>round</sub> was simply set equal to the final live weight (see above). The content of crude protein of the feed, x<sub>XP,feed</sub>, was chosen to be 0.17 kg kg<sup>-1, </sup>cf. [Meissner website](http://www.meissner-widder-kaninchen.de/%20F_WERT_TAB1.html). The amount of feed (fresh matter) needed for animal weight gain is 3.5 kg kg<sup>-1</sup> (LfL Bayern). According to DLG (2005), pg.12, \_x\_<sub>n,ret</sub> is 0.03 kg kg<sup>-1</sup>. Using this data, the resulting N excretion is 0.8 kg pl<sup>-1</sup> a<sup>-1</sup>. The UAN content of the N excretions is assumed to be 60 %.
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Deer
|
|
|
|
|
|
According to DLG (2014) deer excrete 16 kg pl<sup>-1</sup> a<sup>-1 </sup>an<sup>-1</sup>. The UAN content of the N excretions is assumed to be 50 % (no value provided [EMEP (2019)](/9%20Literature#emep-2019)-3B-31, Table 3.9), the value of goats was adopted.
|
|
|
According to DLG (2014) deer excrete 16 kg pl<sup>-1</sup> a<sup>-1 </sup>an<sup>-1</sup>. The UAN content of the N excretions is assumed to be 50 % (no value provided by [EMEP (2019)](/9%20Literature#emep-2019)-3B-31, Table 3.9), the value of goats was adopted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Fur animals
|
|
|
|
... | ... | |